Franchise Agreement — What Every Buyer Must Know About Thai Law ✓

✓ Legal content last reviewed 29 September 2026 · synced with the audited Thai edition

Thundthornthep Yamoutai, Ph.D. | LAS Legal | 3 April 2026 | ภาษาไทย

A franchise looks like a shortcut to business success — you get a ready-made brand, a proven system, and training. Yet many investors have put their money in only to find themselves trapped by one-sided contracts that are impossible to exit and barely viable to operate. Thailand's franchise market is worth hundreds of billions of baht per year and continues to grow, but legal protection for franchisees lags far behind most comparable countries. Understanding the legal framework, fee structures, and contractual risk points is essential before signing anything.

The Thai Franchise Landscape

Thailand has more than 500 franchise brands registered with the Department of Business Development (DBD), spanning food and beverage, health and beauty, education, and various services. Hundreds of foreign franchise brands from the United States, Japan, and ASEAN have also entered the Thai market.

However, Thailand does not yet have a dedicated Franchise Act — a significant difference from countries with specific franchise legislation such as the United States, Australia, Malaysia, China, and Indonesia. As a result, Thai franchisees receive considerably less statutory protection than their counterparts in those jurisdictions.

      มาตรา ๕  ในการใช้สิทธิแห่งตนก็ดี ในการชำระหนี้ก็ดี บุคคลทุกคนต้องกระทำโดยสุจริต

      มาตรา ๑๔๙  นิติกรรม หมายความว่า การใด ๆ อันทำลงโดยชอบด้วยกฎหมายและด้วยใจสมัคร มุ่งโดยตรงต่อการผูกนิติสัมพันธ์ขึ้นระหว่างบุคคล เพื่อจะก่อ เปลี่ยนแปลง โอน สงวน หรือ ระงับซึ่งสิทธิ

      มาตรา ๑๕๐  การใดมีวัตถุประสงค์เป็นการต้องห้ามชัดแจ้งโดยกฎหมายเป็นการพ้นวิสัยหรือเป็นการขัดต่อความสงบเรียบร้อยหรือศีลธรรมอันดีของประชาชน การนั้นเป็นโมฆะ

      มาตรา ๔  ข้อตกลงในสัญญาระหว่างผู้บริโภคกับผู้ประกอบธุรกิจการค้า หรือวิชาชีพ หรือในสัญญาสำเร็จรูป หรือในสัญญาขายฝากที่ทำให้ผู้ประกอบธุรกิจการค้า หรือวิชาชีพ หรือผู้กำหนดสัญญาสำเร็จรูป หรือผู้ซื้อฝากได้เปรียบคู่สัญญาอีกฝ่ายหนึ่งเกินสมควร เป็นข้อสัญญาที่ไม่เป็นธรรม และให้มีผลบังคับได้เพียงเท่าที่เป็นธรรมและพอสมควรแก่กรณีเท่านั้น

      ในกรณีที่มีข้อสงสัย ให้ตีความสัญญาสำเร็จรูปไปในทางที่เป็นคุณแก่ฝ่ายซึ่งมิได้เป็นผู้กำหนดสัญญาสำเร็จรูปนั้น

      ข้อตกลงที่มีลักษณะหรือมีผลให้คู่สัญญาอีกฝ่ายหนึ่งปฏิบัติหรือรับภาระเกินกว่าที่วิญญูชนจะพึงคาดหมายได้ตามปกติ เป็นข้อตกลงที่อาจถือได้ว่าทำให้ได้เปรียบคู่สัญญาอีกฝ่ายหนึ่ง เช่น

      (๑) ข้อตกลงยกเว้นหรือจำกัดความรับผิดที่เกิดจากการผิดสัญญา

      (๒) ข้อตกลงให้ต้องรับผิดหรือรับภาระมากกว่าที่กฎหมายกำหนด

      (๓) ข้อตกลงให้สัญญาสิ้นสุดลงโดยไม่มีเหตุผลอันสมควร หรือให้สิทธิบอกเลิกสัญญาได้โดยอีกฝ่ายหนึ่งมิได้ผิดสัญญาในข้อสาระสำคัญ

      (๔) ข้อตกลงให้สิทธิที่จะไม่ปฏิบัติตามสัญญาข้อหนึ่งข้อใด หรือปฏิบัติตามสัญญาในระยะเวลาที่ล่าช้าได้โดยไม่มีเหตุผลอันสมควร

      (๕) ข้อตกลงให้สิทธิคู่สัญญาฝ่ายหนึ่งเรียกร้องหรือกำหนดให้อีกฝ่ายหนึ่งต้องรับภาระเพิ่มขึ้นมากกว่าภาระที่เป็นอยู่ในเวลาทำสัญญา

      (๖) ข้อตกลงในสัญญาขายฝากที่ผู้ซื้อฝากกำหนดราคาสินไถ่สูงกว่าราคาขายบวกอัตราดอกเบี้ยเกินกว่าร้อยละสิบห้าต่อปี

      (๗) ข้อตกลงในสัญญาเช่าซื้อที่กำหนดราคาค่าเช่าซื้อ หรือกำหนดให้ผู้เช่าซื้อต้องรับภาระสูงเกินกว่าที่ควร

      (๘) ข้อตกลงในสัญญาบัตรเครดิตที่กำหนดให้ผู้บริโภคต้องชำระดอกเบี้ย เบี้ยปรับ ค่าใช้จ่ายหรือประโยชน์อื่นใดสูงเกินกว่าที่ควรในกรณีที่ผิดนัดหรือที่เกี่ยวเนื่องกับการผิดนัดชำระหนี้

      (๙) ข้อตกลงที่กำหนดวิธีคิดดอกเบี้ยทบต้นที่ทำให้ผู้บริโภคต้องรับภาระสูงเกินกว่าที่ควร

      ในการพิจารณาข้อตกลงที่ทำให้ได้เปรียบคู่สัญญาอีกฝ่ายหนึ่งตามวรรคสาม จะเป็นการได้เปรียบเกินสมควรหรือไม่ ให้นำมาตรา ๑๐ มาใช้โดยอนุโลม

Applicable Law for Thai Franchise Agreements

Comparison with the FTC Franchise Disclosure Rule (USA)

Franchise Fee Structure

1. Initial Franchise Fee

A one-time fee paid at the start to acquire the right to use the brand and system. In Thailand, amounts range from tens of thousands of baht for small franchises to millions of baht for national brands. Check what the fee covers and whether any portion is refundable if the agreement is terminated early.

2. Royalty Fee

An ongoing fee payable throughout the term of the agreement, generally calculated as a percentage of Gross Revenue or Net Revenue — not profit. This means the franchisee is liable for Royalty even if the business is operating at a loss.

3. Marketing / Advertising Fund

Beyond the Royalty, there is often a Marketing Fund of 1–3% of revenue that franchisees pay into a central pool for national brand advertising. Verify whether there are financial reports on how this fund is used and a channel for complaints if it is managed without transparency.

4. Renewal Fee

When the franchise agreement expires, the franchisee typically pays a renewal fee that may be equal to or less than the Initial Fee. Determine whether the franchisor has the right to refuse renewal and on what grounds — for example, whether the franchisee must pass quality inspections and upgrade the outlet to the latest design standards, which can involve significant costs.

Territory — A Critical Issue

Territory is one of the most important and most frequently disputed issues in franchise business.

Post-Termination Non-Compete

Franchise agreements typically include a post-termination non-compete clause, which in Thailand is governed by the general framework of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 5 (good faith) and the Unfair Contract Terms Act B.E. 2540, Sections 4 and 5 (Section 5 covers agreements restricting the freedom to carry on an occupation or business). Thai courts consider whether the restriction is reasonable, looking at its duration, geographic scope, and the type of business prohibited.

Intellectual Property Rights

Trademark

Under the Trademark Act B.E. 2534, Section 68, a license to use a trademark must be in writing and registered with the Trademark Registrar at the Department of Intellectual Property. Most franchise agreements incorporate a Trademark License Agreement, but many franchisors have not completed the registration process correctly.

Termination Conditions and Penalties

Termination provisions are among the highest-risk points in franchise agreements. Common problems include:

• Immediate termination by the franchisor without notice, while the franchisee must give 3–6 months' notice.
• Broadly defined grounds for termination, such as "failure to comply with standards" without defining those standards.
• High early termination penalties — some contracts impose a penalty equal to the Royalty remaining for the full unexpired term.
• Prohibition on assignment — the franchisee cannot sell the franchise rights or must obtain the franchisor's consent.

Under the Unfair Contract Terms Act B.E. 2540, Section 4, a court has the power to reduce or modify a term of a standard-form contract (or consumer contract) that imposes a burden on the other party beyond what a reasonable person would ordinarily expect. However, this process is slow and costly.

LAS Risk Assessment: Key Franchise Contract Checkpoints

Detailed Comparison: Thailand vs. FTC vs. Australia

Complex Structures — Multi-Unit and Master Franchise

Single Unit Franchise

The basic model — the franchisee receives the right to operate a single outlet. Suitable for those just starting out. Lower risk due to lower investment, but limited revenue potential and reduced bargaining power with the franchisor.

Multi-Unit Development Agreement

The franchisee commits to opening multiple outlets within a defined territory according to a schedule — for example, three branches within three years. The benefit is a reduced Initial Fee and a wider Territory. The risk is a binding obligation to open on schedule; failure may result in loss of the Territory.

Area Developer (AD)

Similar to Multi-Unit, but the Area Developer may also sub-license to some Sub-Franchisees. Requires a higher investment and greater expertise.

Master Franchise

The Master Franchisee acquires the right to act as franchisor at a national or regional level, with the right to grant Sub-Franchise rights to others. Revenue comes from the spread on Franchise Fees and Royalties collected from Sub-Franchisees. The investment is very high — some brands require tens of millions of baht — but the income potential is also very high. The risk is substantial because the Master Franchisee is responsible for the entire network.

Preparation Before Negotiating a Franchise Agreement

Step 1 — Research Phase (2–4 weeks)

• Study the brand yourself — use the product or service as a customer first.
• Check the franchisor company's registration records at the DBD.
• Verify trademark status at the Department of Intellectual Property (ipthailand.go.th).
• Contact at least 3–5 operating franchisees to ask about their real experience.
• Search for news of litigation or disputes involving the franchisor.

Step 2 — Financial Modelling (1–2 weeks)

• Build a three-scenario P&L Model — Optimistic / Base / Pessimistic.
• Calculate the Break-Even Point — how much must be sold to recover the investment?
• Calculate ROI and Payback Period including Royalty and Marketing Fund.
• Confirm Working Capital is sufficient for the first 6–12 months.

Step 3 — Legal Review (1–2 weeks)

• Have a lawyer review the contract focusing on the 7 critical points: Territory, Non-Compete, termination conditions, penalties, IP rights, Marketing Fund, and renewal conditions.
• Negotiate amendments to high-risk clauses before signing.
• Check whether the contract covers online channels and who owns the Online Channel.

Special Clauses to Request

Performance Threshold Protection

Request a provision that the franchisor may not terminate the agreement if sales fall below the Minimum due to causes within the franchisor's control, such as changing the central pricing, adding competing outlets in the area, or ceasing marketing support.

Audit Rights

The franchisee should request the right to audit Marketing Fund expenditure at least once per year, with an annual summary report on how the Marketing Fund was spent each financial year.

Training and Support Guarantee

Specify clearly: (1) how many hours of initial training the franchisor must provide and what it covers; (2) how many Refresh Training sessions per year; and (3) the Technical Support channel and Response Time. Without these, the franchisor may reduce or cease support without breaching the contract.

Foreign Franchises in Thailand — FBA and Royalty Tax

Royalty Payments Remitted Abroad

When a Thai franchisee pays Royalty to a foreign franchisor that is a company not carrying on business in Thailand, the income falls under Section 40(3) of the Revenue Code, and the payer withholds tax under Section 70, not Section 70 bis, which concerns the remittance of profits out of Thailand. Section 70 requires the tax to be withheld at the income tax rate for companies and juristic partnerships; the rate that actually applies must be checked against that rate and, separately, against the applicable double taxation agreement (DTA). Do not attribute the 15% rate to Section 70 bis. Royalty tax costs must be planned for in advance, as many franchisees forget to include this in their Financial Model.

FBA Considerations for Foreign Franchises

A foreign franchisor wishing to operate directly in Thailand must consider the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542, as retail business is listed in Schedule 3. Any Master Franchise company must therefore have Thai nationals holding at least 51% of its shares, or must obtain a Foreign Business License from the Director-General of the DBD.

Case Studies — Common Thai Franchise Disputes

Case 1 — Territory Encroachment Dispute

A franchisee received a contract for an Exclusive Territory within a 2-kilometre radius. The franchisor subsequently opened a Company-Owned branch 1.5 kilometres away, claiming the new branch was in a "different area" because the Territory was defined only by street name — not by coordinates or a clearly stated radius. The franchisee was unable to prove a breach. Lesson: Territory must be defined by GPS coordinates or a map annexed to the contract.

Case 2 — Non-Transparent Marketing Fund

A group of franchisees complained that the franchisor collected more than THB 5 million per year into a Marketing Fund but never provided a spending report, and national sales did not grow. Under Thai law as it currently stands, the franchisor has no legal obligation to report Marketing Fund usage to franchisees unless it is expressly required by the contract. Lesson: Negotiate Marketing Fund Audit Rights into the contract from the outset.

Case 3 — Franchisor Refuses Renewal

A franchisee who had operated successfully for five years, with strong sales and high customer satisfaction, was refused renewal when the agreement expired. The franchisor claimed the franchisee had failed certain quality inspection items that had been added to the standards without prior notice. Because the original contract did not specify renewal conditions clearly, the franchisee had no enforceable right. Lesson: Specify renewal conditions precisely and include a prohibition on changing quality standards during the term of the agreement without adequate notice.

Dispute Resolution for Franchise Disputes

1. Direct Negotiation

The first and least expensive option. Always attempt this first, particularly for minor disputes arising from different interpretations of the contract. Having a lawyer represent you in negotiations helps avoid making statements that could be used against you in subsequent legal proceedings.

2. Mediation

A neutral mediator helps both parties reach a mutually acceptable outcome. Less expensive than litigation, and outcomes are generally more durable than court judgments. The Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) or the Thai Arbitration Association can provide mediation services.

3. Arbitration

Appropriate for high-value franchise agreements or those with a foreign element. The process is confidential, and arbitrators with specific expertise may be chosen. For cross-border agreements, ICC, SIAC, or THAC (Thailand Arbitration Center) are recommended.

4. Civil Litigation

Used when other options have failed. Franchise disputes are typically filed with the Civil Court or the Central Intellectual Property and International Trade Court (for IP-related matters). Drawbacks: slow, expensive, and proceedings may be made public.

The Future of Thai Franchise Law

The Department of Business Development has studied and drafted Thai franchise legislation on several occasions, but no bill has yet passed through the legislative process. If a dedicated statute were enacted, it would likely cover:

• Mandatory pre-signing disclosure of a Franchise Disclosure Document
• A Cooling-Off Period of not less than 14 days
• Marketing Fund transparency requirements
• Fair renewal rights and conditions
• Mandatory Mediation before litigation of franchise disputes

Until such a law exists, anyone seeking protection comparable to international standards must rely entirely on effective contract negotiation and high-quality legal advice.

Standard Franchise Agreement — 12 Core Clauses

A well-drafted franchise agreement should cover at least the following 12 core sections, consistent with international practice.

Transfer and Resale of Franchise Rights

The right to assign the franchise is a significant issue that affects the franchisee's exit strategy.

Key Transfer Issues to Check in the Contract

• Must franchisor consent be obtained? — Usually yes. Check whether the franchisor may refuse without giving reasons.
• Does the franchisor have a Right of First Refusal (ROFR)? — The franchisor may have the right to repurchase the franchise before it is transferred to a third party.
• What is the Transfer Fee? — Typically 10–50% of the Initial Fee, or a fixed amount.
• Must the transferee complete new training? — Who bears the training costs?

LAS Flash Checklist Before Signing a Franchise Agreement

SME Case Studies — Real Franchise Disputes in Thailand

Case 1 — Company A: Coffee Shop Franchise and a Unilateral Royalty Increase

Company A, an SME operator, purchased a coffee franchise licence from a well-known brand. The agreement fixed the Royalty at 5% of monthly gross revenue but contained no cap on future increases. Two years after opening, the franchisor notified Company A of a Royalty increase to 7%, citing improvements to the support system. The agreement allowed the franchisor to "adjust the rate as appropriate".

Legal Issue: The ambiguous drafting granted the franchisor unilateral modification rights. Courts may hold that such a clause conflicts with the duty of good faith under TCCC Section 5 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act B.E. 2540, Section 4.

Lesson: Fix the Royalty rate with a maximum annual increase cap and require at least 90 days' prior written notice of any adjustment.

Case 2 — Company B: Restaurant Franchise and Overlapping Territory

Company B was granted an Exclusive Territory described only by street names, without any annexed map or GPS coordinates. After 18 months of operation, the franchisor opened a Company-Owned outlet in a shopping centre directly opposite, arguing that the mall fell outside the named street and was therefore in a different territory. Company B's revenue fell 35% within three months.

Legal Issue: A Territory described only by street names without coordinates makes it difficult to prove an encroachment. Although Company B could invoke good faith under TCCC Section 5, the burden of proof remained with Company B.

Lesson: Define Territory by GPS coordinates or a radius measurement with an annexed map, and ensure Online and Delivery Zone rights are expressly included.

Case 3 — Company C: Education Franchise and Arbitrary Termination Without Cure Period

Company C purchased the franchise rights to a tutoring school brand and invested over THB 3 million in premises and teacher training. After 14 months of operation, the franchisor served an immediate termination notice citing Company C's use of unapproved teaching materials — materials Company C had never been informed were unapproved. The agreement contained no Cure Period.

Legal Issue: Immediate termination without a Cure Period may contravene the duty of good faith under TCCC Section 5. Company C may seek damages for breach of contract under TCCC Section 215 (Section 420 is the tort provision and does not fit a contractual dispute), but must prove loss. Claims are stronger where evidence clearly shows that no warning was given and no opportunity to remedy was afforded.

Lesson: Require a Cure Period of at least 30 days for remediable breaches, and ensure the agreement includes a comprehensive list of approved and prohibited materials. Ambiguous standards should be resolved in the franchisee's favour on principles of contra proferentem.

Summary Comparison — Thailand vs. FTC vs. Australia vs. Malaysia

Supreme Court Decision — Interpreting a Contract Whose Wording Is Clear

FAQ — 5 Common Questions About Franchise Agreements

Summary

A franchise can be an excellent business model — but it is not a guaranteed path to wealth. The legal gap in Thailand means that franchisees must rely on their own due diligence and a strong advisory team to a greater degree than in countries with dedicated franchise legislation. Thailand's franchise market offers substantial opportunity, but it also contains hidden traps. The keys to success are thorough research, honest financial analysis, and having a lawyer review the contract before signing. A franchise agreement must be read and understood in its entirety before any money is committed — because once signed, negotiating power diminishes substantially and the legal tools available to help you are fewer than you might expect.