Table of Contents
- Introduction — Franchise Business in Thailand
- Legal Framework Governing Franchise Agreements
- Key Elements of a Franchise Agreement
- Franchise Fee & Royalty Fee Structure
- Intellectual Property Protection
- Territory Rights and Non-Competition
- Key Risks and Cautionary Points
- Pre-Signing Franchise Agreement Checklist
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- References
1. Introduction — Franchise Business in Thailand Overview and Context
Franchise business in Thailand has grown steadily, with hundreds of franchise systems currently registered with the Department of Business Development (กรมพัฒนาธุรกิจการค้า — DBD), spanning food and beverage, retail, beauty, education, healthcare, and many other sectors. This growth reflects franchise's status as a preferred business model — both for franchisors seeking rapid expansion using franchisee capital, and for franchisees seeking to launch a business built on a proven brand and operating system.
A significant weakness in Thailand's current legal landscape for franchising is the absence of a dedicated Franchise Act (Specific Franchise Act). This contrasts with other jurisdictions such as the United States, where the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Franchise Rule mandates pre-contractual disclosure, or the European Union, which maintains a specific legal framework for franchise arrangements. In Thailand, parties must instead rely on a combination of general statutes, creating legal uncertainty and elevated risk for both sides of the franchise relationship.
This article analyzes the legal framework applicable to franchise agreements in Thailand, the essential elements that a well-drafted franchise agreement should contain, fee structures, intellectual property protection, territory provisions, and the legal risks that both franchisors and franchisees should understand before entering into a franchise relationship.
Thailand has no dedicated Franchise Act. Legal protection for both parties therefore depends primarily on the quality and comprehensiveness of the franchise agreement itself. A balanced, carefully drafted agreement is of paramount importance.
2. Legal Framework Governing Franchise Agreements Applicable Laws in the Absence of a Specific Franchise Statute
Because Thailand has no dedicated franchise legislation, franchise agreements are governed by a combination of general statutes applied in conjunction. The key laws are as follows:
2.1 Civil and Commercial Code (ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์ — CCC)
The Civil and Commercial Code (ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์) is the primary statute governing franchise agreements in Thailand, particularly through several relevant books and titles:
Book III — Specific Contracts: Provisions on lease (from Section 537), agency (from Section 797), and hire of work (from Section 587) may be applied to supplement gaps in a franchise agreement, depending on the true nature of the relationship between the parties. Thai courts will characterize the relationship based on its substance rather than its label.
มาตรา ๕๓๗ อันว่าเช่าทรัพย์สินนั้น คือสัญญาซึ่งบุคคลคนหนึ่งเรียกว่า ผู้ให้เช่า ตกลงให้บุคคลอีกคนหนึ่งเรียกว่า ผู้เช่า ได้ใช้หรือได้รับประโยชน์ในทรัพย์สินอย่างใดอย่างหนึ่งชั่วระยะเวลาอันมีจำกัด และผู้เช่าตกลงจะให้ค่าเช่าเพื่อการนั้น
Read มาตรา ๕๓๗ in the box. The statutory Thai text is the PDF. English on this page is a reading aid.
มาตรา ๑๗๑ ในการตีความการแสดงเจตนานั้น ให้เพ่งเล็งถึงเจตนาอันแท้จริงยิ่งกว่าถ้อยคำสำนวนหรือตัวอักษร
Read มาตรา ๑๗๑ in the box. The statutory Thai text is the PDF. English on this page is a reading aid.
มาตรา ๑๔๙ นิติกรรม หมายความว่า การใด ๆ อันทำลงโดยชอบด้วยกฎหมายและด้วยใจสมัคร มุ่งโดยตรงต่อการผูกนิติสัมพันธ์ขึ้นระหว่างบุคคล เพื่อจะก่อ เปลี่ยนแปลง โอน สงวน หรือ ระงับซึ่งสิทธิ
Read มาตรา ๑๔๙ in the box. The statutory Thai text is the PDF. English on this page is a reading aid.
2.2 Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค พ.ศ. 2522 — 1979)
The Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979) (พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค พ.ศ. 2522) is relevant to franchise business particularly with respect to advertising and the presentation of information to prospective franchisees who may in some circumstances be characterized as "consumers." The Act prohibits false or exaggerated advertising (Section 22) and grants consumers the right to receive accurate and sufficient information before making a decision. Additionally, the Contract Committee under the Act has authority to designate businesses as "contract-controlled businesses", whose contracts must contain the required terms and must not contain unfair terms (Sections 35 bis to 35 novies).
2.3 Trademark Act B.E. 2534 (พระราชบัญญัติเครื่องหมายการค้า พ.ศ. 2534 — 1991)
มาตรา ๖๘ เจ้าของเครื่องหมายการค้าที่ได้จดทะเบียนจะท าสัญญาอนุญาตให้บุคคลอื่นใช้เครื่องหมายการค้าของตน ส าหรับสินค้าที่ได้จดทะเบียนไว้ทั้งหมดหรือบางอย่างก็ได้
สัญญาอนุญาตให้ใช้เครื่องหมายการค้าตามวรรคหนึ่ง ต้องท าเป็นหนังสือและจดทะเบียนต่อนายทะเบียน
การขอจดทะเบียนสัญญาอนุญาตดังกล่าวตามวรรคสอง ให้เป็นไปตามหลักเกณฑ์และวิธีการที่ก าหนดในกฎกระทรวง แต่ค าขอจดทะเบียนนั้นอย่างน้อยต้องแสดงรายการดังต่อไปนี้
(๑) เงื่อนไขหรือข้อก าหนดระหว่างเจ้าของเครื่องหมายการค้านั้น และผู้ขอจดทะเบียนเป็นผู้ได้รับอนุญาตที่จะท าให้เจ้าของเครื่องหมายการค้านั้นสามารถควบคุมคุณภาพของสินค้าของผู้ขอจดทะเบียนเป็นผู้ได้รับอนุญาตได้อย่างแท้จริง
(๒) สินค้าที่จะได้รับอนุญาตให้ใช้เครื่องหมายการค้านั้น
Read มาตรา ๖๘ in the box, including the PDF spacing in ท า and ส าหรับ. Paragraph two requires a written license registered with the registrar. Section 44 is not in this box.
2.4 Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (พระราชบัญญัติการแข่งขันทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2560 — 2017)
Franchise agreement provisions that may restrict competition — such as resale price maintenance, territorial allocation, or tied purchasing obligations — are subject to scrutiny under the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (พระราชบัญญัติการแข่งขันทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2560), in particular Section 54 (prohibition on horizontal agreements including price-fixing, market division, and bid-rigging), Section 55 (prohibition on similar restrictions between businesses that are not competitors) and Section 57 (prohibition on unfair trade practices). Notably, Section 56(3) provides a specific exemption for franchise arrangements from Section 55 only; it does not remove them from Section 57. The Trade Competition Commission has also issued a Notice on Guidelines for Considering Unfair Trade Practices in the Franchise Business (B.E. 2562, in force 4 February 2020) under Section 57, and a person who breaches Section 55 or Section 57 is liable to an administrative fine of up to 10 per cent of revenue in the year of the offence (Section 82).
2.5 FTC Franchise Disclosure Rule (International Reference Standard)
Although not directly applicable in Thailand, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Franchise Rule requires franchisors to provide prospective franchisees with a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) at least 14 days before the signing date. Thai legal practitioners frequently reference this standard when advising on pre-contractual disclosure obligations, even though Thai law has no dedicated franchise statute. However, since 4 February 2020, the Trade Competition Commission Notice on Guidelines for Considering Unfair Trade Practices in the Franchise Business (B.E. 2562), issued under Section 57 of the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560, requires franchisors to disclose material information to franchisees before contracting and treats certain conduct as potentially unfair trade practices — for example, compelling the purchase of goods or services unrelated to the franchise business, imposing different terms on franchisees without justifiable reason, and opening a new outlet near an existing franchisee without first offering it to that franchisee. Disclosure duties therefore no longer depend on the terms of the contract alone. Adopting FDD-style disclosure remains a best-practice recommendation for franchisors operating in Thailand.
The absence of a dedicated franchise statute means that Thai franchisees carry materially higher legal risk than franchisees in countries with specific franchise laws — particularly regarding pre-contractual disclosure, renewal conditions, and termination rights. These matters depend primarily on the franchise agreement, supplemented by the Trade Competition Commission's franchise notice (B.E. 2562) issued under Section 57 of the Trade Competition Act, which makes the quality of the agreement the decisive factor in protecting the franchisee's interests.
3. Key Elements of a Franchise Agreement Essential Contractual Components
A well-balanced franchise agreement should contain the following essential elements. Each component must be drafted with clarity, completeness, and a fair allocation of rights and obligations between the parties.
Definitions
Define every key term — "Franchise System," "Trademarks," "Confidential Information," "Territory," "Gross Sales" — to prevent inconsistent interpretations in later disputes.
License Grant
Specify whether the license is exclusive or non-exclusive, the scope of rights granted, the permitted period, and the conditions under which the franchisee may use the trademarks, know-how, and franchise system.
Fees and Payments
Define the Initial Franchise Fee, ongoing Royalty Fee, Marketing Fund contribution, training fees, and any other charges, along with clear calculation methods and payment schedules.
Territory
Delineate the business territory, exclusive territory rights if any, and provisions addressing indirect competition — such as online sales outside the designated area.
Operating Standards
Reference the Operations Manual and quality standards, specify operating procedures, and define the franchisor's rights to inspect franchisee operations and enforce compliance with standards.
Training and Support
Set out the franchisor's obligations regarding initial training, ongoing training, marketing support, and operational assistance throughout the term of the agreement.
Term and Renewal
Specify the initial agreement term, the conditions and procedures for renewal, grounds for termination by either party, and the legal consequences upon expiry or termination.
Post-Termination Obligations
Cover the non-compete clause, non-solicitation obligations, return of materials and property, cessation of trademark use, and settlement of any outstanding payments upon termination.
4. Franchise Fee & Royalty Fee Structure Fee Structures and Tax Implications
The fee structure in a franchise agreement is one of the most heavily negotiated aspects and a frequent source of disputes. Thai law does not prescribe maximum or minimum fee rates; fee levels are therefore determined entirely by negotiation between the parties.
4.1 Initial Franchise Fee
The Initial Franchise Fee (Franchise Fee) is a one-time payment made by the franchisee to the franchisor at the commencement of the franchise relationship, in exchange for the right to use the system, know-how, trademarks, and initial support. This fee is typically non-refundable if the agreement is terminated due to the franchisee's breach.
| Fee Type | Nature | Typical Range (Thailand) | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franchise Fee | One-time payment at entry | THB 50,000 – 5,000,000 | High (Non-Refundable) |
| Royalty Fee | Weekly/monthly % of gross sales | 3% – 10% of gross sales | Medium |
| Marketing Fund | Central advertising fund contribution | 1% – 4% of gross sales | Low |
| Renewal Fee | Fee payable upon agreement renewal | 20% – 50% of original Franchise Fee | Medium |
| Transfer Fee | Fee payable upon assignment of rights | 10% – 30% of original Franchise Fee | Medium |
4.2 Tax Considerations
Where a franchisee pays Royalty Fees to a foreign franchisor, the payment may be subject to withholding tax under the Revenue Code (ประมวลรัษฎากร) Section 70, at the rate of 15% (or at a reduced rate under an applicable Double Taxation Treaty between Thailand and the country where the franchisor is domiciled). Parties should consult a qualified tax advisor to analyze the applicable withholding tax position before executing the agreement.
In practice, an excessively high Royalty Fee (above 8–10% of gross sales) may leave the franchisee with insufficient profit margin, which is a common precursor to premature termination. A thorough financial projection analysis should be conducted by the franchisee before agreeing to the royalty rate.
5. Intellectual Property Protection Protecting IP Assets in a Franchise Relationship
Intellectual property (IP) is the core of any franchise business. The primary value that a franchisor offers to a franchisee consists of the right to use the system, brand, and know-how — all of which are IP assets. Inadequate IP protection therefore threatens the integrity of the entire franchise system.
5.1 Trademarks (เครื่องหมายการค้า)
The franchisor must ensure that all trademarks forming part of the franchise system are properly registered in Thailand under the Trademark Act B.E. 2534 (1991) (พระราชบัญญัติเครื่องหมายการค้า พ.ศ. 2534) before granting any license to the franchisee. Without registered trademark protection, the franchisor cannot sue infringers or claim compensation for trademark infringement; it retains only the right to sue for passing off under Trademark Act Section 46, second paragraph, which is significantly more difficult to enforce in practice.
5.2 Trade Secrets and Know-How (ความลับทางการค้า)
Recipes, production processes, operations manuals, software systems, and customer data all constitute know-how and trade secrets (ความลับทางการค้า) protected under the Trade Secrets Act B.E. 2545 (2002) (พระราชบัญญัติความลับทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2545). Section 3 of that Act provides that protected trade information must be: (i) not generally known or readily accessible; (ii) of commercial value by reason of its secrecy; and (iii) subject to reasonable steps taken by the owner to keep it secret. Franchisors should ensure that all three criteria are satisfied and documented.
5.3 Confidentiality Clause
The franchise agreement should contain a comprehensive confidentiality clause covering the pre-contractual, contractual, and post-termination periods. The clause should bind both the franchisee and its employees to strict obligations of non-disclosure regarding the franchisor's confidential information. It is advisable to specify agreed Liquidated Damages for breach of the confidentiality obligation, to avoid the practical difficulty of proving actual loss in a litigation context.
6. Territory Rights and Non-Competition Territorial Protection and Competitive Restrictions
Territorial provisions and non-competition clauses are among the most common sources of disputes between franchisors and franchisees, particularly in an era where e-commerce can bypass physical territory boundaries entirely.
6.1 Types of Territory Rights
- Exclusive Territory: The franchisor guarantees not to authorize any other franchisee to operate within the defined territory. This provides the highest level of protection for the franchisee but limits the franchisor's expansion capacity within the area.
- Protected Territory: Similar to exclusive territory, but with specified carve-outs — for example, online distribution channels or sales at specific venues such as airports and hospitals may be excluded from the protection.
- Non-Exclusive Territory: The franchisor provides no territorial protection guarantee and grants only the right to operate within the defined area. This structure is generally not suitable for businesses that rely on building a local customer base within a specific geographic area.
6.2 Non-Competition Clause (ข้อกำหนดไม่แข่งขัน)
Non-competition provisions in franchise agreements are typically divided into two components: (i) an in-term non-compete obligation, which prohibits the franchisee from operating or holding an interest in a competing business during the term of the agreement; and (ii) a post-term non-compete obligation, which restricts competitive activities for a defined period after termination. The Civil and Commercial Code (ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์) does not impose specific limits on non-competition clauses, but Thai courts tend to assess whether such clauses are reasonable having regard to their duration, geographic scope, and the type of business restricted. An overly broad non-compete clause risks being held contrary to public order and good morals under the Civil and Commercial Code Section 150, rendering it void and unenforceable.
มาตรา ๑๕๐ การใดมีวัตถุประสงค์เป็นการต้องห้ามชัดแจ้งโดยกฎหมายเป็นการพ้นวิสัยหรือเป็นการขัดต่อความสงบเรียบร้อยหรือศีลธรรมอันดีของประชาชน การนั้นเป็นโมฆะ
Read มาตรา ๑๕๐ in the box. The statutory Thai text is the PDF. English on this page is a reading aid.
A post-termination non-compete clause that is practically enforceable in Thailand should be limited to a period not exceeding 2 to 3 years, cover a geographically reasonable area, and restrict only business activities of the same type as those conducted by the franchisee during the agreement term.
7. Key Risks and Cautionary Points Risk Analysis for Franchisors and Franchisees
Both franchisors and franchisees should be aware of the following legal risks before entering into a franchise relationship.
7.1 Risks for the Franchisee
- Imbalance of Bargaining Power: Franchisors typically have significantly greater bargaining power and often present "take-it-or-leave-it" standard-form agreements, leaving the franchisee limited room to negotiate. Franchisees should seek to negotiate key provisions before signing.
- Termination Without Compensation: Some agreements allow the franchisor to terminate with ease and without any obligation to pay compensation, potentially resulting in total loss of the franchisee's investment. High Risk
- Unilateral System Changes: The franchisor may materially change the operations manual, product range, or operating system in ways that significantly increase the franchisee's costs without any corresponding compensation.
- Inadequate Pre-Contractual Disclosure: Some franchisors fail to disclose financial performance data, operating results of existing outlets, or past disputes — leaving the franchisee to make a decision on incomplete information.
7.2 Risks for the Franchisor
- Know-How Leakage: A dishonest franchisee may misappropriate know-how, trade secrets, or customer lists for use in a competing business after termination. High Risk
- Brand Damage: A franchisee operating below brand standards can cause reputational damage to the entire franchise system.
- Vicarious Liability for Franchisee's Acts: In certain circumstances, third parties (such as the franchisee's customers) may seek to hold the franchisor liable for the franchisee's actions, arguing that the franchisee is the franchisor's "agent." The agreement should contain clear provisions confirming that the franchisee operates as an independent contractor and not as an agent or employee of the franchisor.
8. Pre-Signing Franchise Agreement Checklist Due Diligence Checklist Before Executing the Agreement
Before executing a franchise agreement, both franchisors and franchisees should carefully review the following items.
For the Franchisee
- Verify the franchisor's trademark registrations in Thailand
- Request and review financial performance data for existing franchise outlets
- Investigate the franchisor's dispute and litigation history
- Analyze the complete fee structure and its impact on projected cash flow
- Understand the termination conditions and all consequences arising on termination
- Confirm whether the Territory granted is exclusive or non-exclusive
- Review all non-compete obligations — both during and after the agreement term
- Evaluate the quality and adequacy of the training and support programs offered
- Examine tied purchasing requirements (Tied Purchasing / Supply Restrictions)
- Consult a lawyer experienced in franchise law before signing
For the Franchisor
- Verify the prospective franchisee's financial qualifications and relevant experience
- Provide full and accurate disclosure of all material information to the franchisee
- Ensure all trademarks and IP rights are properly registered in Thailand
- Prepare a comprehensive and current Operations Manual before grant
- Establish clear quality standards and inspection procedures
- Confirm that agreement provisions comply with the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (พระราชบัญญัติการแข่งขันทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2560)
- Have a fully prepared and adequately resourced training and support program ready
9. Frequently Asked Questions FAQ — Franchise Agreement in Thailand
Q1: Does Thailand have a specific Franchise Act?
Thailand does not currently have a dedicated Franchise Act. Franchise agreements are governed by the Civil and Commercial Code (ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์), the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979) (พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค พ.ศ. 2522), the Trademark Act B.E. 2534 (1991) (พระราชบัญญัติเครื่องหมายการค้า พ.ศ. 2534), and the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (พระราชบัญญัติการแข่งขันทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2560) in combination. As a result, the level of protection afforded to the franchisee depends primarily on the quality and completeness of the franchise agreement.
Q2: What is the difference between a Franchise Fee and a Royalty Fee?
A Franchise Fee is a one-time payment made upon entry into the franchise system, in exchange for the right to operate under the franchisor's brand. A Royalty Fee is a recurring periodic payment calculated as a percentage of the franchisee's gross sales, paid as ongoing compensation for the continued use of intellectual property and ongoing support. Both must be clearly defined and separately addressed in the franchise agreement.
Q3: What is the typical term length for a franchise agreement in Thailand?
Thai law does not prescribe a minimum term for franchise agreements. In practice, major franchise systems typically set initial terms of 5 to 10 years, with renewal rights. The agreement must clearly specify the conditions for renewal, the grounds and notice requirements for termination, and any compensation obligations, to prevent future disputes.
Q4: What rights does a franchisee have if the franchisor terminates early without cause?
If the franchisor terminates the franchise agreement without justifiable cause, the termination is a breach of contract and the franchisee is entitled to bring a claim for damages under the Civil and Commercial Code (ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์) Section 215; if the franchisee elects to rescind in response, it may also claim restoration to its former position under Section 391, without prejudice to the claim for damages (Section 391, last paragraph). The claim may include a pro-rata refund of the unearned portion of the Franchise Fee and compensation for unrecoverable investment costs (sunk costs). The outcome in any specific case will depend on the contractual provisions and the circumstances of the termination.
Q5: Does a franchise agreement need to be registered in Thailand?
Franchise agreements are not required to be registered. However, if the agreement involves a trademark license, the Trademark License Agreement must be made in writing and registered with the Department of Intellectual Property (กรมทรัพย์สินทางปัญญา) under the Trademark Act B.E. 2534 (1991) (พระราชบัญญัติเครื่องหมายการค้า พ.ศ. 2534), Section 68, second paragraph. Without registration, the license is void for non-compliance with the required form (Civil and Commercial Code Section 152).
References
- Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand (ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์)
- Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979) (พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค พ.ศ. 2522)
- Trademark Act B.E. 2534 (1991) (พระราชบัญญัติเครื่องหมายการค้า พ.ศ. 2534)
- Trade Secrets Act B.E. 2545 (2002) (พระราชบัญญัติความลับทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2545)
- Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (พระราชบัญญัติการแข่งขันทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2560)
- Department of Business Development (กรมพัฒนาธุรกิจการค้า — DBD) — www.dbd.go.th
- Department of Intellectual Property (กรมทรัพย์สินทางปัญญา) — www.ipthailand.go.th
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Franchise Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 436) — International Reference Standard
- Thai Franchise & License Association — www.thaifranchisecenter.com
Related Articles
Legal Disclaimer
This article is prepared solely for academic and general informational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice for any specific matter or transaction. The legal landscape governing franchise arrangements in Thailand is subject to change; readers should verify the current status of applicable statutes and regulations. Readers should consult a qualified legal counsel before acting on any information contained in this article. The author and Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd. disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the contents of this article without professional legal consultation.
© 2026 Thundthornthep Yamoutai, Ph.D. — Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd. (LAS) — All Rights Reserved.